Thomas Bangalter on AI in music: Not Interested

Thomas Bangalter on AI in music: not interested in the creative use of AI is the central claim explored in this introduction, and Thomas Bangalter, one-half of Daft Punk, sets out his reasons for not engaging with the creative use of artificial intelligence in music. He says the main reason is that AI depends on prompting, a verbal expression, while his relationship to creation occurs at a deeper level that does not express itself through words.

Bangalter states that the most interesting part of the creative process is about understanding feelings rather than an intellectual or expressive exercise, and he argues that unpredictability, which he views as necessary for social progress, should not arise from machines. He warns that technological unpredictability from artificial intelligence is dangerous.

The article also notes Bangalter’s post-Daft Punk collaborations with filmmaker Alfonso Cuarón and German DJ Rampa.

Thomas Bangalter is one-half of Daft Punk. Following Daft Punk, his collaborations include filmmaker Alfonso Cuarón. He has also worked with German DJ Rampa.

Bangalter is not interested in the creative usage of artificial intelligence in music. He says the main reason is that AI relies on prompting, a verbal expression. He describes his relationship to creation and to art as happening at a deeper level that does not express itself through words. He says the most interesting part of the creative process is about understanding feelings rather than being intellectual or expressive.

He argues that unpredictability and disruption are needed in society but that such unpredictability should not originate from machines, because technological unpredictability from artificial intelligence is very dangerous.

Thomas Bangalter says he is not interested in the creative usage of artificial intelligence in music. “My relationship to creation and my relationship to art is mostly happening at a deeper level, which does not express itself through words. That’s probably why I’m not really interested in the creative usage of artificial intelligence for many reasons.” “But the main one probably is because it goes through a verbal expression, which is prompting, and I feel really the most interesting part of the creative process is happening not at all on an intellectual level or on an expressive level, where you’re actually going through a process which is about understanding your feelings, and, and I feel it’s the same, you know, where we’re sitting here [talking] about architecture.”

“Unpredictability, I feel. I feel that unpredictability is what will save this society because everything that happens are surprises. There are bad surprises, but it can only happen also through good surprises, and that’s really the complex world today because on one hand, unpredictability and disruption needs to happen to get us all of this mess.” “But it cannot happen from the machine because if you have unpredictability from artificial intelligence, then this is very dangerous. Everything that happened in history is through an impulse of collective derailment from society.” “So it’s complicated because we need to surprise ourself and to be more and more unpredictable, and we can’t have technology do that for us.”

Thomas Bangalter emphasizes unpredictability and disruption as essential elements of human creativity and social change. He states: “Unpredictability, I feel. I feel that unpredictability is what will save this society because everything that happens are surprises. There are bad surprises, but it can only happen also through good surprises, and that’s really the complex world today because on one hand, unpredictability and disruption needs to happen to get us all of this mess.” He frames surprises as both positive and negative and links them to the need for disruption in society. He says that this unpredictability is an inherent part of creative life.

But it cannot happen from the machine because if you have unpredictability from artificial intelligence, then this is very dangerous. Everything that happened in history is through an impulse of collective derailment from society.

He concludes with: “So it’s complicated because we need to surprise ourself and to be more and more unpredictable, and we can’t have technology do that for us.” He frames the problem as the danger of substituting human unpredictability with technological unpredictability.

“My relationship to creation and my relationship to art is mostly happening at a deeper level, which does not express itself through words. That’s probably why I’m not really interested in the creative usage of artificial intelligence for many reasons.”

“But the main one probably is because it goes through a verbal expression, which is prompting, and I feel really the most interesting part of the creative process is happening not at all on an intellectual level or on an expressive level, where you’re actually going through a process which is about understanding your feelings, and, and I feel it’s the same, you know, where we’re sitting here [talking] about architecture.”

“Unpredictability, I feel. I feel that unpredictability is what will save this society because everything that happens are surprises. There are bad surprises, but it can only happen also through good surprises, and that’s really the complex world today because on one hand, unpredictability and disruption needs to happen to get us all of this mess.”

“But it cannot happen from the machine because if you have unpredictability from artificial intelligence, then this is very dangerous. Everything that happened in history is through an impulse of collective derailment from society.”

“So it’s complicated because we need to surprise ourself and to be more and more unpredictable, and we can’t have technology do that for us.”

The quoted passages state that Bangalter’s relationship to creation and art operates at a deeper level that does not express itself through words. The quotes state that the primary reason for his disinterest in creative uses of artificial intelligence is that such processes “go through a verbal expression, which is prompting.” The quotes state that Bangalter views the most interesting part of the creative process as a practice of “understanding your feelings” rather than an intellectual or expressive exercise. The quotes state that unpredictability and disruption are necessary in society and that surprises can be both positive and negative. The quotes state that unpredictability produced by machines would be “very dangerous” and that technology should not be allowed to replace human capacity to surprise itself.

CONCLUSION

Thomas Bangalter on AI in music: not interested in the creative use of AI, he states that he is not interested in the creative usage of artificial intelligence in music because his relationship to creation and to art “is mostly happening at a deeper level, which does not express itself through words.” He states the main reason for his disinterest is that AI “goes through a verbal expression, which is prompting,” and he describes the most interesting part of the creative process as being about “understanding your feelings” rather than an intellectual or expressive exercise.

Bangalter emphasizes that unpredictability and disruption are necessary in society and that surprises can be both positive and negative, and he warns that unpredictability produced by machines “is very dangerous.” He states that technology should not replace human capacity to surprise itself and that the unpredictability and disruption needed for social change cannot come from machines.